Resistance to Trumpism


Holocaust Survivor Confronts Trump’s Immigration Enforcer

 

On the Banality of “Populist” Evil

 
by Andrew Kliman

 
At a public forum held yesterday, Holocaust survivor Bernard Marks confronted Donald Trump’s acting director of the “populist” Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) service and the Sacramento, California county sheriff, who is collaborating with ICE by helping it to round up undocumented immigrants for deportation. Marks, an 87-year-old Jew who survived the Auschwitz and Dachau extermination camps, warned them that “History is not on your side!”

Under Trump’s orders, ICE has increased mass deportations. The Trump administration insists that local law enforcement bodies must help ICE in these efforts, or lose federal grant moneys. But Sacramento, like many other localities across the U.S., continues to be a “sanctuary city” that refuses to collaborate with ICE. The number of undocumented immigrants living in Sacramento is estimated to be 56,000.

Marks also drew comparisons between the “populist” Nazi regime and the immigration policies of the “populist” Trump regime. He noted that, “for no other reason but for being Jewish, I was hauled off by the Nazis,” and that the reason he was imprisoned in concentration camps for 5 and a half years was that Hitler’s regime “picked on people.” ICE is likewise picking on people, as Marks noted, sometimes hauling off Mexican and other immigrants for no other reasons than their nationality and undocumented status.

Bernard Marks

Bernard Marks speaking in Sacramento forum

Marks’ comments and warning were met by loud applause. A video clip from the meeting shows a couple of “populists” in the audience expressing their “economic distress” by covering their ears in response.

Thomas Homan, who Trump appointed as acting Director of ICE two months ago, lashed back in the exact manner that “populist” Adolf Eichmann employed to defend himself before he was hanged. This is “a country of laws … laws that I’m going to continue to enforce––because that’s my job,” Homan said.

Eichmann, a top bureaucrat in Hitler’s “populist” government, oversaw the Nazis’ forced deportation policy. When the government of Israel put him on trial in 1961 for crimes against humanity and the Jewish people, Eichmann defended himself on the grounds that he was only following orders. “I had to obey,” he declared repeatedly. When pleading for a pardon, he wrote, “there is a need to draw a line between the leaders responsible and the people like me forced to serve as mere instruments in the hands of the leaders. I was not a responsible leader, and as such do not feel myself guilty.” During his trial, Eichmann stated that he had to help carry out Hitler’s “final solution,” the extermination of the Jews, because he was bound by an oath of loyalty.

Trump also values loyalty. In his poorly-attended “populist” inaugural speech, Trump stated, “At the bedrock of our politics will be a total allegiance to the United States of America, and through our loyalty to our country, we will rediscover our loyalty to each other.” The very next day, the Resistance against him disloyally erupted in worldwide Women’s Marches that attracted four to five million participants.

Several of the charges against Eichmann were specifically about his “populist” deportation actions. He caused the enslavement, starvation, and deportation of millions of Jews; deported a half-million Poles; deported 14,000 Slovenes; deported tens of thousands of “Gypsies” (Romani people); and deported and murdered 100 Czech children from the village of Lidice. He was found guilty of these and all other crimes he was charged with, and was hanged on June 1, 1962.

Adolf Eichmann on trial

Adolf Eichmann on trial

Philosopher Hannah Arendt coined the term “banality of evil,” which appears in the subtitle of her book on Eichmann’s trial. It is an attempt to understand the mentality of Eichmann, and of people like the acting ICE director, who regard their criminal behavior as justified because they are “just doing their job.” Arendt has been criticized for over-emphasizing this “banality” of Eichmann’s as an explanation for his crimes, while downplaying his virulent anti-Semitism. I suspect that both sides are right: Eichmann was a virulent anti-Semite (“populist”) who also regarded his criminal behavior as justified because he was just doing his job.

In any case, history was not on his side. Let us do what we can to fulfill Bernard Marks prophecy and see to it that history is not on the side of Trump, Homan, ICE, and Sacramento’s sheriff.

Thomas Homan

Thomas Homan

The Resistance Sends Trump-Ryan Obamacare Replacement to Humiliating Defeat

 

 

by Andrew Kliman and Anne Jaclard

 
Donald “The Art of the Deal” Trump lost—bigly. Despite his threats against Republicans who refused to vote for the American Health Care Act (AHCA), and despite his ultimatum that he was done negotiating and the bill had to be voted on immediately, the Republican leadership of the House of Representatives withdrew the bill yesterday afternoon, and Paul Ryan, Speaker of the House, conceded on national television that Obamacare remains “the law of the land” for the foreseeable future.

It had become clear that Trump would fail to get the bill through the Senate, where the Republican majority is slim. But he also failed to get it through the House, where they have a whopping majority. He even failed in his effort to force through a vote of the AHCA, even though it would lose, so that he would have a record of which Republican representatives to persecute for daring to defy him. In the end, he acquiesced to Ryan’s plea that the bill be withdrawn, thereby allowing some Republicans to avoid taking responsibility for depriving their constituents of their health insurance, and others to avoid taking responsibility for passing something less extreme than the total elimination of all features of Obamacare.
Read More

Trump Rolls Out New ‘Muslim Ban’ and Court Blocks It

March 15, 2017 by  

by Anne Jaclard

Donald Trump’s second “Muslim ban” was to go into effect tomorrow, March 16, but it was just stayed by a federal judge in Hawaii, who considers that its Constitutional violations are substantially the same as the first ban’s legal defects. Hawaii is one of several states that are suing to invalidate the law. The federal court there acted first, and its stay has, at least temporarily, prevented the new law from going into effect throughout the U.S.   Read More