Moseley’s Method of Debate: a comment from a Belgian Marxist youth

 
by Roel van de Pol
 

For some time, I have been posting comments in With Sober Senses on the debate between Fred Moseley and Andrew Kliman around Moseley’s interpretation of Marx’s value theory.[1] Before continuing to participate in this debate, I would like to draw attention to the tactics that Moseley has recently been employing. It is important that observers and participants should notice the problems they present.
Read More

All Value-Form, No Value-Substance: Comments on Moseley’s New Book, Part 13

 
by Andrew Kliman
 
Here is the thirteenth installment of “All Value-Form, No Value-Substance,” the series of comments I’m writing on Fred Moseley’s new book, Money and Totality: A Macro-Monetary Interpretation of Marx’s Logic in Capital and the End of the “Transformation Problem.” It responds to part of Moseley’s reply to the twelfth installment.

Please see the “Miscellaneous” section on the homepage of With Sober Senses for links to previous installments.

All Value-Form, No Value-Substance: Comments on Moseley’s New Book, Part 12

by Andrew Kliman

Here is the twelfth installment of “All Value-Form, No Value-Substance,” the series of comments I’m writing on Fred Moseley’s new book, Money and Totality: A Macro-Monetary Interpretation of Marx’s Logic in Capital and the End of the “Transformation Problem.” [Editor's note, Nov. 7, 2016: the link now takes you to the corrected version of the 12th installment rather than to the original version.] It responds to part of Moseley’s reply to the eleventh installment.

And here is Phun with Physicalism!, the interactive Excel spreadsheet file that accompanies Part 12.

Please see the “Miscellaneous” section on the homepage of With Sober Senses for links to previous installments.



Next Page »