Moseley’s Method of Debate: a comment from a Belgian Marxist youth

January 29, 2017 by  
2 Comments

 
by Roel van de Pol
 

For some time, I have been posting comments in With Sober Senses on the debate between Fred Moseley and Andrew Kliman around Moseley’s interpretation of Marx’s value theory.[1] Before continuing to participate in this debate, I would like to draw attention to the tactics that Moseley has recently been employing. It is important that observers and participants should notice the problems they present.
Read More

All Value-Form, No Value-Substance: Comments on Moseley’s New Book, Part 13

January 19, 2017 by  
67 Comments

by Andrew Kliman

Here is the thirteenth installment of “All Value-Form, No Value-Substance,” the series of comments I’m writing on Fred Moseley’s new book, Money and Totality: A Macro-Monetary Interpretation of Marx’s Logic in Capital and the End of the “Transformation Problem.” It responds to part of Moseley’s reply to the twelfth installment. Read More

All Value-Form, No Value-Substance: Comments on Moseley’s New Book, Part 12

November 6, 2016 by  
76 Comments

by Andrew Kliman

Here is the twelfth installment of “All Value-Form, No Value-Substance,” the series of comments I’m writing on Fred Moseley’s new book, Money and Totality: A Macro-Monetary Interpretation of Marx’s Logic in Capital and the End of the “Transformation Problem.” [Editor’s note, Nov. 7, 2016: the link now takes you to the corrected version of the 12th installment rather than to the original version.] It responds to part of Moseley’s reply to the eleventh installment. Read More



Next Page »